it’s such a joy to know no differently than Fox News the right wing propaganda, continue to spew bullshit:
I found no evidence that during Joe Biden’s presidency there was collusion with banks to “defund” Donald Trump or his businesses.
Here’s the breakdown:
Banking & Trump’s loans: Donald Trump and the Trump Organization have long-standing financial relationships with banks like Deutsche Bank and others. During Biden’s presidency, some banks cut ties with Trump after the January 6th Capitol attack, citing reputational and risk concerns. Others sought repayment or restructuring of existing loans.
The definition of an idiot is someone who can’t read. Did you even get past fourth grade?
I stated the Biden‘s had nothing to do with Donald Trump losing financing. The banks made that decision. Because the president’s a fucking moron and incited a riot on January 6.
The joy of my life is knowing fucking assholes like you are still on the planet. My only hope is that a bullet finds the center of your head you worthless fucking piece of shit.
Here’s what the most reliable reporting and fact‑checking show:
---
What We Know
1. Claims: Banks “debanked” Trump under Biden pressure
Multiple news outlets—including Reuters and Washington Post—report that Donald Trump alleges JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America refused his deposits and closed his accounts, allegedly due to political motivations following Jan. 6.
He claims they asked him to close long-held accounts and rejected over $1 billion in deposits, attributing those actions to pressure from Biden-era regulators.
2. Banks’ stated reasoning: “Reputational risk,” not politics
Bank executives and insiders say their decisions were guided by vague regulatory standards around "reputational risk," not political bias. These standards had been emphasized under Biden-era banking supervision.
Banks such as JPMorgan and Bank of America deny that political views played any role and openly support clearer regulations.
3. Regulatory response and broader context
In response to growing concern, the Federal Reserve has removed “reputational risk” from its bank examination criteria.
The White House is preparing an executive order to investigate politicized or unjust “debanking” practices and consider enforcement under consumer protection and antitrust laws.
---
Bottom Line: What’s True—and What’s Still Uncertain
Claim Status
Trump was “debanked” by banks due to Biden administration pressure Alleged but unverified. His claims are documented, but proof of direct political coercion remains unsubstantiated.
Banks acted for political reasons Banks say no. They maintain decisions were based on reputational risk and regulatory guidance—not politics.
Reputational risk policies played a role Yes. Supported by multiple sources and acknowledged by banks and regulators.
Regulatory pushback leading to reform Yes. The Fed has scaled back reputational risk, and new executive order is being drafted.
---
Final Thought
There's strong evidence that Trump believes he was targeted by banks, and that banks were influenced by ambiguous regulatory guidance around reputational risk. However, there's currently no conclusive proof that the Biden administration explicitly directed banks to "debank" political figures like Trump.
You’re not going to see that. You never see anything happen to any of the people you’ve convinced yourself were responsible for all the things that Trump so obviously was responsible for. When are you all gonna fucking wake up and realize everything you believe is bullshit? FFS
Always hated banks. Particularly Chase and BOA. BOA quickly volunteered banking info of “suspected” J6 folks…Not an institution I would trust. Defunding Trump? Not suprising at all.
I pulled out of BoA the minute I heard they were tracking transactions to arrest supporters.
Same. A tidy sum between my bride and I. And we told them why,in a specifically charged letter, with swear words and shit.
What a gigantic steaming pile of mendacity. MAGA just loves being the victim.
it’s such a joy to know no differently than Fox News the right wing propaganda, continue to spew bullshit:
I found no evidence that during Joe Biden’s presidency there was collusion with banks to “defund” Donald Trump or his businesses.
Here’s the breakdown:
Banking & Trump’s loans: Donald Trump and the Trump Organization have long-standing financial relationships with banks like Deutsche Bank and others. During Biden’s presidency, some banks cut ties with Trump after the January 6th Capitol attack, citing reputational and risk concerns. Others sought repayment or restructuring of existing loans.
You are an idiot. First you claim you found no evidence that Donald Trump was debanked, and then you turn around ang admit that it happened.
The definition of an idiot is someone who can’t read. Did you even get past fourth grade?
I stated the Biden‘s had nothing to do with Donald Trump losing financing. The banks made that decision. Because the president’s a fucking moron and incited a riot on January 6.
Did that help your simple brain?
Oh look, a communist. Fuck you in the throat, Jeff. You’re ok with it until it happens to you. Cunt
The joy of my life is knowing fucking assholes like you are still on the planet. My only hope is that a bullet finds the center of your head you worthless fucking piece of shit.
They were not armed! the only shot fired was Capital Police killed a female veteran!
You didn’t dig deep enough.
Here’s what the most reliable reporting and fact‑checking show:
---
What We Know
1. Claims: Banks “debanked” Trump under Biden pressure
Multiple news outlets—including Reuters and Washington Post—report that Donald Trump alleges JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America refused his deposits and closed his accounts, allegedly due to political motivations following Jan. 6.
He claims they asked him to close long-held accounts and rejected over $1 billion in deposits, attributing those actions to pressure from Biden-era regulators.
2. Banks’ stated reasoning: “Reputational risk,” not politics
Bank executives and insiders say their decisions were guided by vague regulatory standards around "reputational risk," not political bias. These standards had been emphasized under Biden-era banking supervision.
Banks such as JPMorgan and Bank of America deny that political views played any role and openly support clearer regulations.
3. Regulatory response and broader context
In response to growing concern, the Federal Reserve has removed “reputational risk” from its bank examination criteria.
The White House is preparing an executive order to investigate politicized or unjust “debanking” practices and consider enforcement under consumer protection and antitrust laws.
---
Bottom Line: What’s True—and What’s Still Uncertain
Claim Status
Trump was “debanked” by banks due to Biden administration pressure Alleged but unverified. His claims are documented, but proof of direct political coercion remains unsubstantiated.
Banks acted for political reasons Banks say no. They maintain decisions were based on reputational risk and regulatory guidance—not politics.
Reputational risk policies played a role Yes. Supported by multiple sources and acknowledged by banks and regulators.
Regulatory pushback leading to reform Yes. The Fed has scaled back reputational risk, and new executive order is being drafted.
---
Final Thought
There's strong evidence that Trump believes he was targeted by banks, and that banks were influenced by ambiguous regulatory guidance around reputational risk. However, there's currently no conclusive proof that the Biden administration explicitly directed banks to "debank" political figures like Trump.
Looks like you triggered a nest of delusional TDS sufferers here. Or one of them and it's sock puppets.
No bank wants to do business with a known fraud and criminal.
One reason I left bank of "america."
When are we going to see the perps in shackles handcuffed together and shuffling onto a C-17 headed to GTMO? It should be big enough to hold them all.
You’re not going to see that. You never see anything happen to any of the people you’ve convinced yourself were responsible for all the things that Trump so obviously was responsible for. When are you all gonna fucking wake up and realize everything you believe is bullshit? FFS
Always hated banks. Particularly Chase and BOA. BOA quickly volunteered banking info of “suspected” J6 folks…Not an institution I would trust. Defunding Trump? Not suprising at all.
It’s not out i it’s not on cnn
🤣🤣😉🤣🤣🤣🤣 you don't know squat diddly shit. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good use of fantasy and wishful thinking. Typical TDS sufferer.
Aw, bless your little heart.
Facts & logic... that's funny coming from someone who voted for a vegetable & then doubled down on a brainless cackling hen, lol.
Hey asswipe, he just talked to press Thursday, lol. O'Biden couldn't keep up with Trump on Trumps worst day, lol.
FYI, Trump was 78 yo when elected, turned 79 o. June 14th, 2025. Please get your fact right before looking like the ass you are! ✌️🇺🇲